4.1274
The question about the existence of a formal concept is senseless. For no proposition can answer such a question.
(For example, one cannot ask: “Are there unanalysable subject-predicate propositions?“)
Link to original
q I don’t understand what he means by “formal concept”, but more broadly I think I understand the sensibility around discerning which questions are working asking, in a spirit of epistemic pragmatism, and in accordance with how he seems to be framing the enterprise of philosophy writ large, i.e. as the work of determining the optimal lines of inquiry.
